| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

let down - again

Page history last edited by Boda 13 years, 6 months ago

It won't go away.  It won't die.  It won't let me be.

 

I'm tired of writing about it.  I'm tired of having to make phone calls about it.  I'm tired of speaking at town halls about it.  I'm tired of begging friends to pay attention to it.

 

For the past 17 years, it's been reduced to four words that don't even approach describing what it really is. 

 

I've lived with it for 20 years.  I still live with it.

 

It made me invisible.  It made my partner invisible.  It made me lie to my friends and coworkers.  It made me rebellious towards my country. It made me an activist.

 

It scared my mother.  People have been killed because of it.

 

It created stress and gave me an ulcer at 21.  It created fear and gave me an anxiety disorder at 28.  At age 38, I survived it - but not without scars.

 

It affects both men and women.  Statistically, women face it more than any other group.

 

At a moment's notice, it could wipe out my career.  Words have power.  By saying three words, three syllables, it could make everything I worked for disappear.

 

It was there waiting for me when I deployed to Iraq, Kuwait, Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, England, Italy, and Germany.  It followed me on vacations to Ireland, France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxemburg, and Sweden.  It greeted me at Customs when I returned to the United States.

 

As a country, having it puts us in the company with the likes of China, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Syria, and Yemen.

 

It was there in the interrogation booth as I talked to insurgents intent on killing me and my countrymen.

 

It was in my headquarters office when I was stationed under the Florida sun.

 

I earned the highest possible performance evaluations 20 years in a row along with ten medals for various achievements - in spite of it - probably because of it.

 

I've made friends because of it.  I lost friends because of it.  It divides allies while arguing strategy to destroy it.

 

It made me cry, laugh, shout, blog, demonstrate, wince, sigh, and clench my teeth.

 

Soldiers have handcuffed themselves to the White House fence because of it.

 

12,000 flags were installed on the National Mall to demonstrate the damage it has wrought.

 

Millions of tax dollars are wasted because of it.  Approximately 14,000 dreams are destroyed because of it.  Even more voluntarily walk away from their dreams to escape it.

 

It weakens our nation's security.  The al-Qaeda message, "Tomorrow is zero hour" went untranslated on September 10th possibly because of it.

 

It's codified into federal law: US Code, Title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, Chapter 37, Section 654.  The military must enforce it.

 

A majority of Americans, regardless of political stripe, are against it and yet, it persists.

 

It's been judged unconstitutional and yet, it persists.

 

The President is against it and yet, it persists.

 

Yesterday, America voted to keep it.  And I take it very personally.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Writing about something without saying what it is is kinda what it's like to live under Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT).  You know it's there.  It's always there, but unless you spill the beans, most folks don't even think about it.  It's not on their RADAR.

 

I chose to share what happened to me yesterday because if I didn't, I would continue a life of deceit.  Pretending I wasn't kicked in the gut was what I did for the 20 years I was on active duty.  Having to be nonchalant after a gay sailor was murdered and pretending I didn't care for fear I would be suspected of being gay was how I survived.  Watching the numbers of gay troops being kicked out go from tens, hundreds, thousands, to the tens of thousands was heart-breaking.  I was talking about football at work.  That is life under DADT.

 

I rarely consider myself a 2nd class citizen.  I did yesterday.  I completely felt 2nd class when the Senate filibustered the defense spending bill - which contains the DADT repeal provision. 

 

Yesterday's vote was probably the last realistic chance to get Don't Ask, Don't repealed this year - possibly for another generation.  The political reality is the bill won't be looked at again until after the midterm elections.  If the Democrats lose seats as they're predicted to, the lame duck session may push the defense bill to the next Congress.  If that happens, the DADT repeal provision will most likely be stripped away.  Other options exist.  President Obama could display historic leadership and issue an executive order to stop discharging his LGB soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines.  It's never happened, but theoretically, he could do it.  The decision from the 9th circuit striking down DADT as unconstitutional could go unchallenged by Obama's Justice Department.  Again... that's to be seen.  Meanwhile, the discharges continue.

 

We are turning this into an in depth discussion. There will be MUCH more to come!!!

 

What's truly frustrating to me is DADT was originally meant to be a baby step towards open and honest service for LGB servicemembers.  It wasn't supposed to be a permanent solution.  With DADT in place, the military for the first time said, homosexuals could serve their country.  They were welcomed to serve when Uncle Sam stopped asking if you are gay.  Of course, the catch was gay soldiers had to be dishonest about their lives in uniform.  The policy goes beyond not saying, "I am gay."  It's about lying about what you did over the weekend.  Where you went for vacation.  Who you hang out with.  What music you like.  All these observations and questions come up in day to day life - military or civilian.  It's small talk.  If you're gay, an honest answer can destroy your career.  I compartmentalized and lied for 20 years.  It's not fair to ask anyone to do that in exchange for wanting to serve their country.  And it comes with baggage - and scars.

 

Yesterday, the planets aligned to make the Senate vote possible to begin the process to dismantle DADT.  It cannot be underestimated how rare an opportunity it was.  A vote that could have made approximately 65,000 LGB troops 1st class citizens along side their straight comrades.  And just like that, the chance slipped away.

 

We are in 4311/6319 discussing the realities of making a change in this policy. What I think I hear Casey is saying is that the general public has moved beyond this discussion in its acceptance of LGBT individuals as being "just like everyone else."  Her point being that it's time for this to change. I think the situation is very complex, and the issue is nowhere near the "front" of public consciousness. Most Americans are worried about keeping/losing their jobs, homes, pensions.... I don't think there is much of a chance that the American public will push this issue to the point where it will make sense for politicians and military leaders to buck the status quo. - Shawn D. 10/5/2010

 

I'm floored to see/hear/read your class discussed DADT.  I would've loved to be a fly on the wall.  Both positions related above are spot on.  Most Americans are indeed ready for this policy to be part of our checkered history.  And, yes.  There are other pressing issues going on in the world right now.  If you took a poll today, repealing DADT would not be in the top spot (much less the top 10 or 100) of issues most Americans are concerned about.  Of course, less than 1% of Americans actually serve their country in uniform (to include a vast majority in Congress, many of the military service secretaries, and two recent Presidents).  Military issues rarely rise to the top of the priority pile except when the rainbow-colored terror guide twitches from yellow to orange.  That's not to demean Americans' patriotism, it's just a fact.

 

As I mentioned above, the Senate vote a couple of weeks ago was the last best chance to repeal DADT legislatively - probably for a generation.  If DADT does goes away, it'll most likely be done via the courts.  Two cases have been ruled on in the past month or so.  They harbor good news for dismantling DADT.  Like so many divisive issues in America, the People didn't discover the error of their ways and make the change themselves.  They were forced when the judiciary stepped in and made the change the People refused to make on their own.  In any case, if it means there's one standard of service and everyone can serve honestly, I'll take it.  ~ Jay Boda

 

Back to my WTI Portfolio

Comments (13)

Ehle so fly said

at 7:04 pm on Sep 22, 2010

i like the way you transition into this alottt , caught my attention very easily :) what is it lol?

Boda said

at 8:04 pm on Sep 22, 2010

thanks Ehle

Ehle so fly said

at 8:06 pm on Sep 22, 2010

woah lots of links to check out this is going to take a whiel lollll

Boda said

at 8:12 pm on Sep 22, 2010

lol - saved me a lot of typing ;-)

Aardvark Marker said

at 5:10 pm on Sep 26, 2010

Ah...the satisfyingly simple compositional effect of linking. I love it. and I love the composition.

"Writing about something without saying what it is is kinda what it's like to live under Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT). You know it's there. It's always there, but unless you spill the beans, most folks don't even think about it."

Genius. The rhetorical effect of mystery adds to the message!

Andrea said

at 11:08 am on Sep 23, 2010

Wow, this is an amazing piece Jay :) the way you constructed it made me think "okay...is he talking about what I THINK he is talking about?" which is exactly what you wanted to happen. Fantastic! Seriously... :)

kms said

at 11:26 pm on Sep 30, 2010

Yes, great hook to get readers to read. And all the links - readers can learn as much or little as they desire; yet, still read your entire piece.

It's a shame that the(govt) system even allows bills of differing natures to be attached to each other. So many times we hear of one thing being turned down because legislaturers wanted to say no to what was attached. Then, when we work to analyze our politicians, it makes it even more difficult to understand what their motive was if they voted yes or no. Yes or no to which part? Or their political enemies say they are wishy washy when they vote yes one time and no another...when really one time they may have voted no to part A and yest to part B. It would make so much more sense to have each issue stand alone.

Elizabeth Sellers said

at 7:17 pm on Oct 5, 2010

We are in class right now, talking about your use of font. Do you change fonts to distinguish between the "I" and "me" slants of the first person? Or are we just reading way to much into it... We (the students of 4311) are sitting here talking about how much we THOROUGHLY enjoy your style of writing and your approach and delivery of the subject matter. Nice work!

kms said

at 7:18 pm on Oct 5, 2010

And we the students of 6319 - ditto.

shawn dudley said

at 7:48 pm on Oct 5, 2010

Nice piece. You have a great voice Boda. You make the quandary faced by LGB servicememmbers very real by describing the discomfort of having to lie about what you did over the weekend, or where you went on vacation.

kms said

at 11:17 am on Oct 6, 2010

Hey, great photo Shawn. I haven't see you before on the wiki comment blogs. (We must normally follow diff people.)

Boda said

at 9:25 pm on Oct 5, 2010

Elizabeth - the italicized portion was my way of reflecting on the essay. The brevity of the piece didn't allow me to tell the "rest of the story". I used a different font just to separate it from the original piece. To be honest, I haven't figured the "I" and "me" slants of first person - yet :-) But I appreciate the benefit of the doubt :-)

I hope the piece opened a few eyes, gave everyone a better sense of the reality of the policy, and (hopefully) changed a mind or two. Thanks to both classes for the feedback and encouragement.

Alyssa Blumenthal said

at 10:50 pm on Oct 10, 2010

I just finished reading all of this and I think your writing is absolutely beautiful. I agree with you 100% and I'm sorry that our government doesn't give this the attention it deserves.
You make very good points and I thoroughly enjoyed reading this.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.